1966 Fiat Dino vs. 1956 Saab 92B
To start off, 1966 Fiat Dino is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 2,417 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Fiat Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Fiat Dino weights approximately 615 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Because 1966 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat Dino | 1956 Saab 92B | |
| Make | Fiat | Saab |
| Model | Dino | 92B |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2417 cc | 763 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2480 mm |
