1966 Fiat Dino vs. 1959 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1966 Fiat Dino is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Lincoln Continental (349 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1966 Fiat Dino. (177 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat Dino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 823 kg more than 1966 Fiat Dino. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat Dino | 1959 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Fiat | Lincoln |
| Model | Dino | Continental |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2417 cc | 7043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 349 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.5 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60 mm | 94 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2223 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3330 mm |
