1966 Fiat Dino vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1966 Fiat Dino is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,417 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Fiat Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Fiat Dino (177 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Fiat Dino should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Fiat Dino weights approximately 470 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Fiat Dino (220 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1966 Fiat Dino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat Dino | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Dino | Cedric |
Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2417 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |