1966 Fiat Dino vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 2,417 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Fiat Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Fiat Dino (177 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Fiat Dino should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Fiat Dino weights approximately 500 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Fiat Dino (220 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 Fiat Dino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat Dino | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Dino | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2417 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.5 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2480 mm |