1966 Fiat Dino vs. 2010 Saturn Vue
To start off, 2010 Saturn Vue is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 2,417 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Fiat Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Fiat Dino (177 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Saturn Vue. (167 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Fiat Dino should accelerate faster than 2010 Saturn Vue.
Because 1966 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Vue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Fiat Dino (220 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saturn Vue. (160 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1966 Fiat Dino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saturn Vue.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat Dino | 2010 Saturn Vue | |
Make | Fiat | Saturn |
Model | Dino | Vue |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2417 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1860 mm |