1966 Fiat Grand Break vs. 1997 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 238 kg more than 1966 Fiat Grand Break.
Because 1966 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat Grand Break | 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Fiat | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Grand Break | 164 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1272 kg | 1510 kg |
