1966 Fiat OT vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1980 Zastava 1300 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Fiat OT (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Fiat OT should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1966 Fiat OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Fiat OT (134 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 1966 Fiat OT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat OT | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Fiat | Zastava |
Model | OT | 1300 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2430 mm |