1966 Fiat OT vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1966 Fiat OT. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 590 kg more than 1966 Fiat OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Fiat OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat OT. (134 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat OT.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat OT | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | OT | CU-X |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 80 L |