1966 Fiat OT vs. 2002 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Korando is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 SsangYong Korando (138 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1966 Fiat OT. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat OT.
Because 2002 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Fiat OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 SsangYong Korando (209 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat OT. (134 Nm). This means 2002 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat OT | 2002 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Fiat | SsangYong |
| Model | OT | Korando |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 90.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 70 L |
