1966 Fiat OT vs. 2003 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2003 Renault Koleos is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Koleos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 75 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Koleos weights approximately 1006 kg more than 1966 Fiat OT.
Because 2003 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Fiat OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Fiat OT (134 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Koleos. (105 Nm). This means 1966 Fiat OT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Koleos.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat OT | 2003 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | OT | Koleos |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1761 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 80 L |