1966 Fiat OT vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1966 Fiat OT. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat OT.
Because 1966 Fiat OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (207 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat OT. (134 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat OT | 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | OT | MX-Flexa |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2760 mm |
