1966 Fiat OT vs. 2008 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2008 Toyota RunX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota RunX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota RunX weights approximately 377 kg more than 1966 Fiat OT.
Because 1966 Fiat OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota RunX (147 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat OT. (134 Nm). This means 2008 Toyota RunX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat OT.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat OT | 2008 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | OT | RunX |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 134 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 81.5 mm |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 60 L |