1966 Fiat OT vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1966 Fiat OT. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat OT.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Fiat OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat OT. (134 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat OT | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | OT | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 351 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 94 mm |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 69 L |
