1966 Fiat OT vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1966 Fiat OT. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat OT.
Because 1966 Fiat OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Fiat OT (134 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1966 Fiat OT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat OT | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | OT | Cube |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 82 L |
