1966 Fiat OT vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 1,280 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Fiat OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Fiat OT (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Fiat OT should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Because 1966 Fiat OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Fiat OT (134 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm). This means 1966 Fiat OT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat OT | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | OT | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 50 L |