1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1966 Ford 12 M is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 605 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | Ford | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 12 M | 6C |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 2442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 100 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 77 L |
