1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1966 Ford 12 M is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 965 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 12 M | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3690 mm |
