1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 1966 Ford 12 M is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford 12 M (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford 12 M weights approximately 70 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | 12 M | 92 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2480 mm |