1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1957 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1966 Ford 12 M is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford 12 M (70 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 315 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 1957 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | 12 M | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2540 mm |
