1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1970 Marcos 2 Litres
To start off, 1970 Marcos 2 Litres is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Marcos 2 Litres is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Marcos 2 Litres (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Marcos 2 Litres should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford 12 M weights approximately 40 kg more than 1970 Marcos 2 Litres.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Marcos 2 Litres (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1970 Marcos 2 Litres will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 1970 Marcos 2 Litres | |
Make | Ford | Marcos |
Model | 12 M | 2 Litres |
Year Released | 1966 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2270 mm |