1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1986 Audi 4000
To start off, 1986 Audi 4000 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 4000 (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 4000 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1986 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 4000 (137 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (105 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 1986 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | 12 M | 4000 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2550 mm |