1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1987 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1987 Mercury Sable is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Mercury Sable weights approximately 505 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 1987 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | 12 M | Sable |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 2513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |
