1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (200 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 685 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 1997 Acura CL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | 12 M | CL |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |
