1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1997 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1997 Fiat Siena is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 1997 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford 12 M (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1997 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1997 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Fiat Siena weights approximately 405 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm). This means 1997 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 1997 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Ford | Fiat |
Model | 12 M | Siena |
Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1300 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |