1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 371 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 12 M | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |
