1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2000 Vector RD 180 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Vector RD 180 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector RD 180 (180 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector RD 180 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Vector RD 180 (175 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Vector RD 180 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
| Make | Ford | Vector |
| Model | 12 M | RD 180 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2390 mm |
