1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2001 Nissan HyperMini
To start off, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,988 cc, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan HyperMini weights approximately 410 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan HyperMini (130 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (105 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan HyperMini will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 2001 Nissan HyperMini | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 12 M | HyperMini |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2988 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1285 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 2670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 1900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |
