1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | 12 M | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |