1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Honda Integra
To start off, 2003 Honda Integra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda Integra (217 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 2003 Honda Integra | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 12 M | Integra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |