1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2004 Saab 9-7X is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Saab 9-7X (272 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saab 9-7X should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 2004 Saab 9-7X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Saab 9-7X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saab 9-7X (372 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Saab 9-7X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 2004 Saab 9-7X | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | 12 M | 9-7X |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 272 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2880 mm |
