1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2005 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 2005 Land Rover Freelander | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | 12 M | Freelander |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 174 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |
