1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 632 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Tribute (262 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (105 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | Tribute |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 262 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 62 L |