1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 1199 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (105 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 12 M | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 395 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 2074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |