1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 12 M | Raider |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 83 L |
