1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2008 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2008 Subaru Forester is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Subaru Forester weights approximately 575 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 2008 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Subaru Forester (320 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 2008 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | 12 M | Forester |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |