1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | 12 M | Ram |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 98 L |