1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 5008 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | 12 M | 5008 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2735 mm |