1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | 12 M | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2685 mm |
