1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2012 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2012 Opel Meriva is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Opel Meriva (94 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Opel Meriva (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 2012 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | 12 M | Meriva |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |