1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2012 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (180 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 2012 Saab 03-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford 12 M | 2012 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | 12 M | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |