1966 Ford 12 M vs. 2013 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Express is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Express (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1466 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford 12 M | 2013 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | 12 M | Express |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 6600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 2361 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5692 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2012 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 2070 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3429 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 117 L |
