1966 Ford Consul vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Consul would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Ford Consul. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Consul weights approximately 12 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Consul. (85 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Consul | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Consul | 102 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1181 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 782 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2160 mm |
