1966 Ford Consul vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Consul would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1966 Ford Consul. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Consul.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Consul. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Consul. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Consul | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Ford | Citroen |
| Model | Consul | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1181 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58.2 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
