1966 Ford Consul vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Consul would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1966 Ford Consul. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Consul.
Because 1966 Ford Consul is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Consul. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Consul. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Consul | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Consul | Cruze |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1181 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2685 mm |