1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1966 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 313 kg more than 1966 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Cortina (185 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1966 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford Cortina has manual transmission. 1966 Ford Cortina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Cortina | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Cortina | Equator |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 160 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3260 mm |