1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1966 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Cortina weights approximately 439 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Cortina (185 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 1966 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Cortina | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Cortina | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2420 mm |
