1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Cortina | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Cortina | Falcon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 221 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 59 L |