1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Cortina | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | Cortina | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |
