1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1966 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Cortina.
Because 1966 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Cortina. (185 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Cortina | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Cortina | Epica |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |