1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1966 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Cortina.
Because 1966 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Cortina (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Cortina | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Cortina | E-350 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 57 L |